Summary

Creating a cross-org vision and effective strategy

Goal: Create a vision and the strategy that results in a coherent, focused experience across a multi-sided SaaS platform

Task: I turned a doomed “Home Page Redesign” project into a shared North Star vision 5 divisions co-created, which funded roadmap across 5+ product surfaces in ’25/’26/’27 and had real user impact.

“Turns out – we’re shipping our org chart.

5 divisions are using the Home page as advertising space. And they’re not wrong, according to their own priorities – which are the only priorities the company has.”

– Root-cause analysis email to my boss

45% -> 84% Engaged

Clicked the most critical content immediately

+370% B2B Reach

More unique learners clicked assigned content

36.4% -> 55% Start

Platform content start rate (action on first click)

5 Divisions Created One North Star Vision:

We will deliver a focused and expertly tailored experience that guides learners to efficiently discover the most relevant content for their needs.”

Company Context:

The Pluralsight platform is a multi-sided enterprise Learning Platform.

  • ~500,000 active learners
  • ~$400M ARR
  • Search API handling ~4.4M queries a month
  • The discovery surfaces I owned reach 87% of learners

Project Summary:

  • The Ask: redesign a cluttered home page.
  • The Problem: 5 divisions using Home as advertising space; no purpose for the page
  • The System Fix: a shared vision + strategy (prioritization framework)
  • The Output: a clear, focused redesigned Home Page; shared vision
  • The Outcomes: Engagement, Reach, Retention | Org alignment on vision & strategy across 5 shared product surfaces | 20/27  H2 2025 Roadmap Items
*Drag the center divider left or right to compare the before and after designs for the Home page
Before After
Problem

Problem:


Operating Context:

Third year of turnaround. No added headcount, three org reductions behind me. Reported to the CPO. Partnering with five Division leaders and 6-12 delivery teams across engineering, design, and product management. A platform serving roughly 500,000 active learners, and a discovery surface reaching 87% of them.

“A product surface used by 5 divisions, like the Home page, needs a shared vision and purpose co-created by 5 divisions.”

– from my pitch to company leadership

Engagement & Retention Down

  1. Companies pay us to assure Learners do assigned content
  2. Learners can’t find their Assigned content

Cross-Division Company Conflict

  • No shared purpose for Home
  • 5 divisions competing for space
How could this have failed? (click for more)

In the 3rd year of a turnaround, ‘page space’ seemed to my leader-partners to be a business win. It’s difficult to

  1. Convince leaders & teams to take the time to ALIGN before redesigning
  2. REMOVE content from a page
  3. Push an approved 1 sprint activity to a 3 sprint activity
  4. And above all, gather 5 division leaders into one room for 2 whole dedicated days

Home page chaos was the symptom – the fix was to align the business to the purpose of the shared product area. Aligning that goal with each division’s already existing OKRs and getting full buy in for this made me a great leader for this job.

A Home Page redesign that didn’t solve the root issue would have been a failure.

Playbook

Playbook:


What I Did

  1. Vision Workshop (2 days, 5 division leaders + Executive team)
  2. Strategy: easily applicable ‘Criticality’ framework (so the tactical teams could apply this vision).  [case study coming soon]
  3. Home page redesign
  4. Lean UX/user validation testing

Before

  • A cluttered home page, with every content type everywhere.
  • Assigned Content (what companies pay us for) is obscured.
  • Company in conflict

North Star Vision

  • Focused
  • Expertly Tailored
  • Guided
  • Efficient
  • Relevant
  • Prioritized

After

  • Learners see the most relevant next action before reading a word.
  • /Criticality/ drives the layout instead of content type.
  • 5 divisions in alignment.

Before: cluttered and unclear

After: guided and focused

Tradeoffs: What came off the page, and who gave it up

  • Assessment team. Pre/post test results moved to the Assessment landing page.
  • Hands-On and Labs. Engineering course recommendations moved to Software Development.
  • ML team. Recommendations capped at the top 3 to 5 per learner.
  • All five Divisions.
    • Feature advertising moved to each content type’s own landing page.
    • New information architecture for Navigation, Home, (Content) Landing Pages
How did we mitigate the risk that this vision might do more harm than good? (click for more)

When removing content, it’s important to assure that the end result is more usable than when we started.

To assure that the vision and strategy (applied Criticality framework) would result in positive user experiences, we ran quick, few-day Lean UX user validation testing to test our top 3 riskiest assumptions.

Results: 6 of 6 task success, 6.8 of 7 ease, 66-second average completion – way better than the current Home page.

Results

Results:


Outputs:

5 Divisions aligned on a shared North Star

Home Page that's 'guided and focused'

I was made owner of the Home page

Outcomes:

Guided experience across 5 product surfaces

20/27 H1 2026 Roadmap items

I mean, I really wasn't a fan of taking time away from production to 'draw on the wall'...

But I gotta admit - in this company, I've never been working in a room with that many leaders, together.

And the results speak for themselves. ”

– E.L. , Senior Content Operations Leader

UX Outcomes: Life Improved*

Our platform is complex and multi-sided. With 6+ personas, it was important that we improved the lives of all of them, be they internal colleagues or external clients. *Thanks to Jared Spool for the UX Outcome Hypothesis model

  • By making /criticality/ drive the page instead of content type, we improved the enterprise B2B learner’s life (and every other learner persona) by replacing a scan of forty options with one obvious next action.
  • By surfacing assigned work at the top of Home, we improved the enterprise B2B admin’s life by making assigned learning easy to start (without chasing their teams to do it).
  • By publishing one shared criteria for what belongs on Home, we improved our company’s experience by giving every team a defensible answer to “why isn’t my widget here?” that they could apply inside their own planning.

Current Status (a/o Q4 2026)

  • “Guided and Focused” is the current experience principle governing Home, Search, Browse, Recommendations, and Navigation
  • Rolled out to active users (results as noted)
  • Changes/ improvements receiving roadmap investment across 5+ divisions for 2025 & 2026 (est 2027)
How do I use my own assignments as a way to upskill designers & design leaders? (click for more)

I build senior capability by handing people the work one level above them, with cover, using my own projects. This way, they get to work directly with me, division leaders and the executive team on something that matters to the business.

  • A junior designer co-facilitated the design sprint with me, so facilitation became a capability for her and her team.
  • A manager on my team carried this vision and the Home redesign at board level and was later promoted to Director.

Lesson

Lesson:


What did get wrong here, and where did fix it?

Mistake: Team meetings & All-Hands is not enablement

In a rush, I treated the enablement – helping teams understand how to apply the vision and strategy inside their own product areas – as communication. I announced the vision at a Product All Hands…

…but teams who weren’t in the room didn’t have what they needed to apply the vision to their own areas, so I had a lot of 1:1 meetings to redirect the teams working on our shared surfaces.

Not a good use of anyone’s time, and far too reactive for teams moving fast.

The Fix: Build the strategy into existing processes

On the next project, B2B Analytics Page, I announced the vision, the framework, and then built it into the documents and rituals where decisions already happen. This looked like:

  • Eisenhower matrix in the default Discovery doc
  • A checkbox in roadmap intake.
  • A qualifying question asked of every feature in quarterly planning.

Teams had the guardrails in their own workflow (not a slide, ha!). Roadmap proposals came in already framed by the vision & strategy, even before design was formally involved.

Project Information

Partnering with 5 divisions to shape vision and strategy across the org, influencing roadmaps and priorities through ’25/’26. The Proof: 45% → 84% on the surface that drives B2B renewal, across a $400M ARR platform.
  • Design

    Done Q2 2025 over 3 sprints (6 weeks)

  • Client

    Pluralsight. B2B SaaS, EdTech. ~ 1,900 employees. PE-backed, in stabilization.

  • My Role Then

    Director, UX Product Design and Research, Learning Experience. Reported to the CPO.

  • Scope & Span

    Search, Browse, Home, Navigation, Recommendations. Discovery surfaces reach 87% of platform users.

  • Team & Reach

    15-person org (2 managers). Aligned 5 Divisions at the leadership level and 6+ delivery teams (engineering, design, & PM).

  • Platform Type

    B2B SaaS, multi-sided (Enterprise admin, individual learner, internal authoring)

  • Status (a/o Q4 '26)

    In production at www.pluralsight.com; roadmap investment across 5+ divisions for 2025 & 2026 (est 2027)

  • Tags

    Cross-Org Alignment, Decision Frameworks, Platform Coherence, Vision

Back